Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation +5854%
32.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
384
Shading Units
9728
24
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net