Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
17.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
696.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
Opal
Whistler XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy