Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M5950 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

AMD FirePro M5950 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M5950
0.696 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150 +69%
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
17.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
696.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
GP108
Whistler XT GL
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy