Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320

AMD FirePro M5950 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 M320 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock855MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M5950 +27%
0.696 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M320
0.547 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
855 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
5
480
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.840 GPixel/s
17.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.10 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
696.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
547.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Whistler
GPU Name
Jet
Whistler XT GL
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy