Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R7 M265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 M265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock825MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000 +61%
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Opal
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy