Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +240%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Nov 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
Amethyst
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy