Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6100 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6100
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +1614%
28.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
768
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Saturn
GPU Name
AD103
Saturn XT GL (216-0843006)
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy