Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6100 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6100
1.651 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +648%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Saturn
GPU Name
AD107
Saturn XT GL (216-0843006)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy