AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+214%
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
960
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU116
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
