Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps +74%
2.285 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
960
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.80 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
71.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.570 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.285 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
71.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
31W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU117
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy