Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1035MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q +305%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
960
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.12 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
82.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.299 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
82.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GA107
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy