Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
8768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +2067%
28.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
76
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
AD103
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy