Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +701%
1.306 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
M86
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL (216-0683010)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy