Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon E6465

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon E6465

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +580%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Sep 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
2
960
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Caicos
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy