Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +252%
1.306 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2
0.371 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M8x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
4
960
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.280 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.280 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
371.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
M88
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy