Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX Go540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 7.200GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2004
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Go
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
225 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
7.200GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
NV43
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
QDFX-GO540-N-A4
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
110 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy