Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6300M +139%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
12
960
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Navi 24
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy