Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R5 M320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 M320 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock855MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +138%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M320
0.547 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
855 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.840 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.10 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
547.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Jet
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy