Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 M265X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock625MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +63%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
625 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
10
960
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Venus
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy