Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M390X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M390X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M390X +126%
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
32
960
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Amethyst
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy