AMD FirePro RG220 vs AMD FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
+1483%
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro RG
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
