AMD FirePro RG220 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+785%
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro RG
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
80
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
