AMD FirePro RG220 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+2876%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro RG
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
Unknown
73 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
