Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD FirePro W8000

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +3932%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Remote
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
1
Compute Units
28
80
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy