Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1000MHz vs 950MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +20%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
375W
750 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy