CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
VS
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+6448%
3.405 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
0.052 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
2
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.00 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV610
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV610 PRO (215LKCAKA14FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
25W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
2
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
6
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
7
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
8
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
9
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
10
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 5770
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy