Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FireMV 2260

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FireMV 2260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +8412%
3.405 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
2
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
15W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy