Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +5220%
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy