CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
VS
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GeForce 405 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+7466%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 405 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
VS
GeForce 405 OEM
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GT218
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
25W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
2
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
6
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
7
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
8
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA A2
9
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
10
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy