Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +11641%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
40W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G86
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy