Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +613%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
182W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy