Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 77% (1683MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1070 +89%
6.463 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
1792
Shading Units
1920
112
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
202.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
101.0 GFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.463 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
202.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP104
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP104-200-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy