Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2040MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (205W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +206%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
205W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 10
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy