Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000 +33%
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GM206
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy