Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +324%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA100
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy