Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD FirePro S7000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000 +100%
2.432 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
10
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy