Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +511%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy