Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +758%
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro Server
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

265W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
R600
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy