Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +39%
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro Server
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Curacao
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy