Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD FirePro S9000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1672 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000 +1820%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
120
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy