Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +452%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
3840
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 21
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy