Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000 +158%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Lexa
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy