Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250XE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250XE 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000 +193%
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250XE
1.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.76 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1101 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy