Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

AMD FirePro S9000 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock3300MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +2413%
81.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3300 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
6144
112
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
633.6 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1267 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
162.2 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.10 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
355W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 31
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX+
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy