Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +271%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD107
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy