Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD FirePro S9050 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD FirePro S9050
VS
AMD FireStream 9250
AMD FirePro S9050
AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +222%
3.226 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy