Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +677%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1792
Shading Units
144
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF116
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy