Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +36%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy