Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +35%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760
2.378 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1152
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.77 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.07 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.378 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
170W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK104
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy