Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +76%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GM206
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy